Comparison with Great Britain and Germany
Article volumetric text
1) Overview: Europe's three different approaches
France, the United Kingdom and Germany present three models of state control of gambling:- France - "limited and centralized": licenses are issued by ANJ, only bets, poker and lotteries are allowed; online casinos are prohibited.
- The UK is "liberal and marketable": almost all forms of gambling are allowed under a UKGC licence, including online slots, live games and casinos.
- Germany is a "regional compromise": it is regulated at the land level, there are federal frameworks (Glücksspielstaatsvertrag), betting and poker are allowed, and online slots with restrictions.
2) France: limited legalization and fiscal emphasis
The French system is built on the principle of "allowed by exception."
Online games are legal in only three categories - betting, poker, lotteries.
Online casinos (roulette, blackjack, slot machines) are prohibited.
The regulator is the Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ), which has been the same for all formats since 2020.
Taxation is high: cumulatively up to 59% PBJ (GGR) on online rates and up to 63% on lotteries.
Casinos work only offline, under the control of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
France's focus is consumer protection and social responsibility, not market expansion.
3) UK: open and globally oriented market
Regulator - UK Gambling Commission (UKGC).
Licenses are available for all forms of online gambling: slots, roulette, poker, betting, live games.
Operator requirements - RTP transparency, data protection, advertising control, Responsible Gambling programs.
Taxation is milder: Remote Gaming Duty - 21% GGR, rates and lotteries are taxed separately.
Advertising is allowed, but strictly labeled (18 +, risk warnings).
The British model is considered the most mature in the world, combining innovation (VR, crypto, AI) with strict compliance practices.
4) Germany: federalism and land compromises
Since 2021, Glücksspielstaatsvertrag 2021 (GlüStV) has been in effect - a new interregional land agreement.
Allowed: online poker, betting and online slots, but with strict restrictions:- €1 limit per spin, no autospin, mandatory pauses and deposit limits, game time control.
- The regulator is Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL), based in Halle.
- Taxation: 5.3% of the turnover of bets on slots and poker, which makes the model sustainable, but limits the profits of operators.
- Advertising is limited in time and channels (prohibited in children's and morning TV).
Germany follows the path of "dosed legalization" - control is higher than in the UK, but more liberal than in France.
5) Comparison of key parameters
6) Principles of regulation: philosophy of three systems
France is a priority for harm prevention and fiscal discipline. Games are a socially controlled product, not a mass service.
Great Britain - a bet on responsible market freedom, where the player is informed and protected, and the operator carries reputational risks.
Germany - finding a compromise between control and income, with a focus on transparent limits and federal equilibrium.
7) Economy and Market (data 2024-2025)
France: the PBJ market is about €14 billion, of which 50% are lotteries and 35% are bets.
UK: over €20 billion PBJ, the largest online segment in Europe.
Germany: about €10 billion PBJ, a fast-growing online market after GlüStV.
France remains the most conservative, but also the most socially protected jurisdiction.
8) Trends 2025-2030
France: It is possible to discuss the partial legalization of online slots (in a limited form) under the control of ANJ.
UK: strengthening of Responsible Gambling norms (limits, AI-monitoring of behavior).
Germany: market stabilization and a possible reduction in turnover tax to increase competitiveness.
TL; DR
France is a strict and socially oriented model (online casinos are prohibited).
The UK is an open market with moderate taxes and strong self-regulation.
Germany is a federal compromise: online casinos are allowed, but with strict limits.
The French system provides maximum protection for players, but limits innovation and competitiveness in Europe.