Panama vs Costa Rica & Belize
Comparison with Costa Rica and Belize (for country: Panama)
Summary in one paragraph
Panama is a regulated and predictable model with a full license for online games and a strong offline ecosystem (hotel casinos, MICE, cruises). Costa Rica - historically gray B2C offshore, relying on "data processing licenses" instead of a specialized gambling license; good for starting B2B/podov, but weak in banking reputation. Belize is a small, more offshore jurisdiction with a formal opportunity to obtain a gambling license, but limited weight from the PSP and a modest offline scene. If you need a balance of "legality + payments + tourism," Panama is more practical; if maximum flexibility and low entry threshold - look to Costa Rica/Belize, taking reputational risks.
Difference map (short table)
What this means for three types of commands
1) B2C operator with LatAm ambitions
Panama: the optimal balance - a real license, clear rules, USD payments, the possibility of an omnichannel with hotel casinos.
Costa Rica: fast start, but weak showcase for banks/payments and "white" advertising.
Belize: you can "formally license," but you have to prove the quality of compliance to each partner.
2) B2B platform/provider
Costa Rica: convenient as an R & D/infrastructure hub (processing, support), without an aggressive B2C showcase.
Panama: excellent "front office" for regional sales + compatibility with licensing partners.
Belize: niche cases if partners accept such an address.
3) Offline casino going online
Panama: the best scenario is a bundle of loyalty card ↔ online wallet, general status, tournaments, quick payments.
Costa Rica/Belize: No natural reliance on offline cluster and urban night economy.
Deep Comparison: Key Blocks
Regulation and licences
Panama: single JCJ regulator, profile license for distance games, clear reporting, KYC/AML and Responsible Gaming.
Costa Rica: missing classic iGaming license; many projects work "de facto" through business permits, which complicates work with banks and legal advertising.
Belize: it is formally possible to obtain licensing, but the practical "weight" of such a license is lower than Panamanian.
Taxes and fiscal deductions
Panama: share with GGR for online/offline + royalties; corporate load depends on the territorial principle.
Costa Rica/Belize: low cost threshold, but hidden cost risks - high PSP fees, manual checks, payment downtime.
Payments and fintech
Panama: USD cards (3DS/tokenization), e-wallet (Skrill/Neteller/AstroPay/Jeton), banks, row - stablecoins; higher confidence in KYC/AML.
Costa Rica/Belize: more often need multi-routes with spare merchants; crypto and alternatives are critical for survival.
Reputation and Marketing
Panama: "regulated offshore" → easier to build PR and brand/media partnerships.
Costa Rica/Belize: Useful for the "back office," but a public storefront can raise questions.
Tourism and offline ecosystem
Panama: 4-5s casino hotels, VIP lounges, shows, MICE, cruises - strong evening product.
Costa Rica: nature/eco-tourism (surf, volcanoes, reserves), but without a developed "casino-lifestyle."
Belize: beaches, diving, small city scene.
When to choose what - scenarios
We take Panama if:1. you need a legal online license with clear rules and reporting;
2. reputation with banks/PSP and quick conclusions are critical;
3. planned omnichannel with offline casinos or active work in Spanish-language traffic.
We take Costa Rica if:1. the project is in the MVP/B2B platform stage and is not publicly released by B2C;
2. You need a fast infrastructure startup and a flexible R&D environment.
3. the team is ready to live with crypto share and manual merchant management.
We take Belize if:1. requires low-cost, formally licensed jurisdiction;
2. partners agree with the offshore address and there are ready-made PSP channels;
3. volumes are moderate, without public campaigns in strict countries.
Operator's checklist for selecting jurisdiction
Model: B2C vs B2B, offline bundle needed/not.
Finance: required PSPs/banks, currencies, crypto policy.
Right: KYC/AML/RG scope, readiness for API reporting and audits.
Marketing: where and how we buy traffic, the admissibility of advertising.
Reputation: do you need a "clean showcase" for partners and media.
Time/budget: start speed vs long-term costs.
Risks and how to reduce them
Payment blocks → multi-PSP, failover routing, e-wallet/stablecoins.
Regulatory claims → transparent T&C, limits/self-exclusion, log storage, certified content.
PR/reputation → publish license number, RG reporting, fast TtW and support 24/7 (es-PA).
Legal connection → role posting (IP/operator/payment agent), contracts with providers and affiliates.
Panama is a regulated regional hub: real online license, USD payments, offline ecosystem and a notable tourist showcase. Costa Rica is a technical platform and accelerator for backend/platforms, but with limited suitability for public B2C. Belize is a compromise offshore for small/niche projects with a willingness to bear reputational and payment risks. The choice depends on what is more important to you: legality and PSP quality (Panama), speed and flexibility (Costa Rica) or a low threshold and formal licensing (Belize).