Crypto Casino
Torrent Gear
How to choose a bonus with the best ratio of conditions and amount
1) Principle: it is not the amount that determines value, but the conditions
A large percentage without soft rules is often worse than the average percentage with an honest WR, adequate max bet, no cap, and full game contribution. Therefore, first we evaluate the conditions, then the amount.
2) What exactly to compare (7 key parameters)
1. Bonus type: non-sticky (more flexible) or sticky.
2. Vager base (WR): for bonus, bonus + deposit, win from FS, cashback.
3. WR multiplier: the smaller the better; more often × 10- × 30 is acceptable.
4. Games contribution: 100% slots - perfect; live/board games 0-10% - slow down the game.
5. Max bet: real rate ceiling (usually €2- €5 or 2-5% of the bank).
6. Cap: ceiling to withdrawal (deposit bonuses undesirable; in FS/loafing is valid and should be explicit).
7. Timing and compatibility: activation/WR windows, can be combined with cashback/quest/tournament.
3) Rapid efficacy formula (ER)
ER (effective return) shows how much "net" value gives a bonus relative to the required turnover.
1. We calculate the required turnover:- to bonus → 'B × WR'
- on bonus + deposit → '(B + D) × WR'
- to win from FS/cashback → 'Amount × WR'
- 'Effective progress = Σ (rate × contribution%) '
3. We evaluate ER ≈ (the part of the bonus/win after cap available for output )/the required turnover '.
The higher the ER at equal risk and timing, the better the bonus.
(This is a practical, "approximate" metric for comparing offers with each other.)
4) Mini scorkard for comparison (0-10 points)
WR and base (0-3): × 10- × 25 per bonus = 3; × 30- × 35 = 2; × 40 per bonus or × 30 per bonus + deposit = 1; worse = 0.
Games contribution (0-2): 100% slots = 2; 70–90% = 1; <70% or cloudy exceptions = 0.
Max bet (0-2): ≥€3 or ≥2% bank = 2; €1- €2 = 1; <€1 = 0.
Cap (0-2): None/High = 2; moderate = 1; hard = 0.
Timing/compatibility (0-1): ≥72 h, can be combined with cashback/quest = 1; otherwise = 0.
8-10 is a great bonus; 5-7 - take under the game plan; ≤4 - pass by.
5) Normal operating plug
WR: × 10- × 30 per bonus; × 30- × 40 only under excellent other conditions.
Contribution: 100% slots; live 0-10% (undesirable for wagering).
Max bet: not less than €2- €5 or a reasonable percentage of the bank.
Cap: for deposit - no better; for FS/childless - clear and adequate.
Type: non-sticky is preferable if the other is equal.
Timeline: At least 72 hours on WR.
6) Compare 4 typical offers (in numbers)
Initial assumptions for comparison: You play slots with a 100% contribution.
Offer A - "Honest reload"
50% to €100, WR × 20 for bonus, max bet €5, no cap, 7 days.
If the rebate is €100, the required sales volume = '100 × 20 = 2,000'.
ER high, scorkard: 3 (WR) + 2 (contribution) + 2 (max bet) + 2 (cap) + 1 (timing) = 10/10.
Offer B - "Generous but Heavy"
100% to €200, WR × 35 for bonus + deposit, max bet €3, no cap, 5 days.
With a deposit of €200: turnover = '(200 + 200) × 35 = 14,000'.
ER low, high deadline risk; scorkard ≈ 5-6/10 (we take only with a large planned turnover).
Offer C - "FS non-wagering but with cap"
60 FS without WR, cap €25, slot fixed.
No wagering is a plus; but the ceiling cuts the top.
Scorkard: WR (3), contribution (2), max bet (not relevant), cap (1), timing (1) → 7-8/10 as a "net mini bonus."
Offer D - "Beautiful But Enticing"
200% to €300, WR × 40 on bonus + deposit, max bet €1, slot contribution 50%, cap 3 × bonus, 48 hours.
The required turnover is huge, the 50% contribution doubles the actual load, the cap cuts the output.
Scorkard: 0-2/10 - we miss.
7) Crucial tree (how to choose in 60 seconds)
1. Deposit bonus?
→ Yes: I check the cap. If there is a cap, almost always a no.
2. WR ≤ × 30 and on bonus?
→ Yes: I go further. → No: I take it only with strong pluses (100% contribution, long terms).
3. 100% slot contribution and max bet ≥ €3?
→ Yes: green light. → No: I consider the actual load and risks.
4. A period ≥ 72 hours and the offer is compatible with cashback/quest?
→ Yes: excellent. → No: I evaluate whether it will drive in a hurry.
5. Non-sticky type?
→ Yes: more flexible than cashout. → No (sticky): ok, if WR is soft and other conditions are good.
6. I consider ER and compare it with alternatives → I take the best.
8) Mini-algorithm before clicking "Activate"
1. Check out: type, WR base, multiplier, contribution, max bet, cap, timing, compatibility.
2. Count turnover (and increase if necessary due to <100% contribution).
3. Check the calendar: do I manage to close the WR without a "race"?
4. Solve the betting strategy: 0.5-1.0% bank per spin, ≤ max bet, 2-3 slots 100% deposit.
5. Cashout plan: how much I fix after WR (for example, 50-80%).
9) Pitfalls and how to get around them
WR on bonus + deposit: The real load is higher than it looks.
Low max bet: easy to break with one click → cancellation.
Long list of excluded games: increases the chance of errors.
Short windows: force "gas" and break discipline.
Combining heavy shares: in total, they turn the bonus into "concrete."
10) Small "negotiation" life hack (for VIP/regulars)
If you have stable activity, a neat history and KYC, ask the manager:- is it possible to reduce WR, remove cap, raise max bet, give non-sticky format.
- Sometimes they meet halfway under your volume.
11) Selection checklist (save)
- WR ≤ × 30 and on bonus, not on bonus + deposit
- Slots 100% contributed (exception list transparent)
- Max bet ≥ €3 or ≥2% bank
- Cap missing (for deposit) or adequate (for FS/loafing)
- Time ≥ 72 hours, no conflict with other promos
- Non-sticky type (preferred)
- ER/Scorkard better than alternatives
The best bonus is not the one where the "percentage is higher," but the one where the conditions are soft and transparent with a reasonable amount: WR for the bonus ≤ × 30, slots 100% contribution, adequate max bet, minimum exceptions, no cap and with real terms. First - scorkard and ER, then - betting plan and cashout. This approach turns the bonus from a "lottery" into a manageable value.