How license suspension or revocation works
Short: the difference between "suspension" and "recall"
License suspension is a temporary measure. The regulator restricts or completely blocks activities until violations are eliminated (usually with a clear list of conditions and a deadline).
License revocation is the final decision: the right to work is lost, the brand is obliged to stop accepting bets/games, conduct a "wind-down" (settlements with players, suppliers) and, as a rule, has no right to apply for a new license for N years.
Grounds: why they stop or revoke their license
1. Player protection (RG) - admission of minors, ignoring self-exclusion, no limits, systemic payment delays.
2. Game integrity - undeclared math changes, uncertified RNG/content, anomalous RTP without investigation.
3. Finance and payments - lack of segregation of customer funds, cash gaps, non-payment of winnings.
4. AML/KYC/KYT - systemic failures of onboarding, non-notification of suspicious transactions, sanctions/PEP risks without control.
5. Advertising and affiliates - misleading promises, targeting <18/21, violation of channel bans.
6. Information security/privacy - PII/payment data leak, lack of MFA/logs, concealment of the incident.
7. Reporting/cooperation - false information, non-compliance with the instructions, failure to appear for an audit.
Procedure: as it usually happens
1) Preliminary actions of the regulator
Notice/Letter of Concern: request documents, logs, explanations.
Interim measures: time limits (stop bonuses/new registrations/part of verticals).
Hearing: Key person hearings/interviews
2) Suspension decision
The conditions for recovery are formulated: what to fix, what audits to pass, by what time frame.
The blocking scale is determined: full stop or partial (for example, only live/bonuses/new clients).
Communication is entrusted to players and "ring-fence" client tools.
3) Decision to withdraw
An official notice is published (often - public statement).
A controlled "wind-down" is assigned with reports on settlement reorganization.
External administrator/monitor and mandatory independent audit are possible.
4) Appeals
There is a period for appeal (for example, 14-30 days) and the right to submit new evidence: eliminated violations, compensation to players, audit reports.
For the duration of the appeal, restrictions may remain (including full stop).
What the operator must do in the first 24-72 hours
0-24 hours
Stop accepting bets/games in the amount specified by the regulator; turn off marketing and affiliates.
Preserve logs in WORM storage; release freeze.
Communication to players: banner/letter with clear steps on conclusions and deadlines.
Ring-fence: separate customer funds, fix account balances.
24-48 hours
Launch a payment plan: schedule, channels, FAQ; set up a hotline.
Transfer the primary package to the regulator: incident maps, customer and balance registers, admin log, RTP/jackpot report.
Assign responsible persons (RACI): Compliance, MLRO, InfoSec, Finance, Support.
48-72 hours
External audit/forensics: pentests/log review, confirmation of segregation of funds.
Update public status: timing, progress, how to apply for withdrawal.
Prepare a remediation plan with deadlines and KPIs.
What will happen to players' money and content
Player funds
Must be segregated and available for withdrawal; on recall - full settlement.
The regulator sometimes requires an escrow/trust or "guarantee account" and daily reconciliations.
Jackpots/Bonuses
Jackpot payouts - strictly from pools; on recall - closing pools per protocol (pay/prorated return).
Bonus funds - according to the rules: either complete refusal, or conversion into real ones under the conditions fulfilled; it is important to be honest and transparent.
Content and providers
At the request of the regulator, suppliers can disable games; all changes are recorded in the version logs.
Final reports to providers and aggregators on GGR/royalties are performed.
Impact Matrix: Suspension vs Recall
"Return to compliance": how to return after suspension
1. Root cause analysis: those/processes/people/data; post-mortem with facts and deadlines.
2. Corrective Actions: close MAJOR → MINOR, attach evidence (screenshots, test acts, new policies).
3. Independent audit: RNG/RTP, AML/KYC/KYT, IB/privacy, reporting.
4. Pilot and validation: canary period with telemetry to the regulatory hub.
5. Public communication: status for players/partners, compensation plan.
6. The regulator's decision: lifting the suspension or extending the restrictions.
"Wind-down": how to close correctly when recalling
Payment plan: deadlines, channels, period of "silent" accrual of bonuses = 0.
Calculation team: dedicated support line, daily progress report.
Debts to providers/aggregators: close on acts; in case of shortage - coordinate the schedule.
Data: store logs for 5-7 years (or according to the local norm); restrict access, transfer copies to the regulator.
Personnel: legal procedures, dismissals/relocation, knowledge transfer.
Infrastructure: disabling environments, revoking keys/certificates, de-publishing applications.
Check list "for refrigerator"
In case of suspension (Day-0)
- Release freeze, WORM log lock
- Stop Sales/Marketing/Affiliates
- Banner/letter to players + FAQ on conclusions
- Ring-fence of balances, reconciliation with banks
- RACI assigned and war-room channels open
- Primary package to regulator: logs, RTP, funds, admin logs
For the period of remediation
- Root Causes and Action Plan with KPIs/Deadlines
- External audit and reports (RNG/RTP, AML, IB, reporting)
- Corrected policies and staff training
- Canary unloading to the regulatory hub
- Public Status and Payment Progress Updates
In case of recall
- Wind-down plan: schedule, channels, who is responsible for what
- Daily reports on payments and balances
- Disable content and close jackpot pools
- Closing royalties to providers/aggregators
- Data archiving and retention, revocation of accesses
- Final regulatory report and public statement
Frequent mistakes and their price
Tightening communication with players → a flurry of complaints, increased supervision, additional sanctions.
Lack of ring-fence → mixing of funds, risk of criminal claims.
Hiding an information security incident → increased privacy fines + reputational damage.
Hot edits without auditing during suspension → lock extension.
Delay in remediation → escalation to recall.
Mini-FAQ
Is it possible to accept deposits when suspended?
As a rule, no. Only returns/withdrawals and settlement of ongoing obligations are permitted.
What about active bonuses?
Most often - freezing/cancellation according to a transparent rule; upon withdrawal - termination of accruals, prioritization of real funds withdrawal.
If you eliminate violations in a week, will the regulator immediately lift the suspension?
The solution depends on audit and telemetry; limited restart with monitoring is possible.
Is it possible to "relicense" in another jurisdiction after revocation?
Problematic: Many regulators share information; revoking jurisdiction and partners will be taken into account in due diligence.
Suspension and revocation of a license is not "lightning from the sky," but a consequence of systemic failures in RG/AML, honesty of games, payments, information security or reporting. Sustainable operators design compliance by design: segregation of funds, certified content with version control, unchangeable logs, strict marketing and readiness for audit. Then even the suspension turns into a controlled pause with a quick "return to compliance," and not into the finale of the story.