Crypto Casino
Torrent Gear
TOP international licenses for online casinos
TOP international licenses (short profiles)
1) MGA - Malta Gaming Authority (Malta)
Why in TOP-1: a strong reputation among providers and payment partners, a developed iGaming ecosystem, understandable processes.
Pros: strict control of the honesty of games, good positions with banks, transparent RG standards, a developed pool of auditors and lawyers, B2B/B2C support.
Disadvantages: higher cost and requirements (office/key personnel), regular audits, tight compliance.
Who fits: international B2C brands of medium and large scale, B2B studios and content aggregators, live casinos.
2) UKGC - UK
Why in TOP-2: the "gold standard" for protecting players and advertising; maximum recognition.
Pros: RG and advertising reference rules, strong ADR mechanisms, high trust rating from banks.
Cons: high cost of owning a license and strict checks, limited exportability (mainly the UK market).
To whom it suits: brands aimed at Britain and operators for whom prestige and strict reputation are key values.
3) Gibraltar - Gibraltar
Why in TOP-3: a historically strong hub of large operators, strict standards and proximity to British practice.
Pros: high requirements for capital and risk control, strong expertise of the regulator, "weight" among banks and providers.
Cons: high entry threshold, focus on mature teams with sustainable processes.
Who is suitable: large international brands, holdings, multi-product operators.
4) Isle of Man - Isle of Man
Why in TOP-4: a stable jurisdiction with a good balance of rigor and flexibility; convenient for a multiproduct.
Pros: strong player protection, good reputation with payment partners, flexibility in group structure.
Cons: noticeable start-up and maintenance costs, thorough checks of beneficiaries and processes.
Who fits: medium and large B2C operators, holding structures, bookmakers and live casinos.
5) Alderney — Alderney Gambling Control Commission (Олдерни)
Why TOP-5: strict technical support for the honesty of games, recognition among providers.
Pros: strong technological expertise, clear procedures for B2B and server hosting.
Cons: above compliance load; some markets will require additional local authorization.
Who fits: B2B platform and content providers, as well as a B2C mid-range segment with a technology focus.
6) Curaçao - new surveillance model
Why in TOP-6: the transition from sublicenses to more direct and transparent supervision is an improvement in market status.
Pros: noticeably better predictability of processes, content certification, more understandable requirements for RG and information security.
Cons: transition period, heterogeneity of practices among providers/banks; a number of countries require a local license.
Who is suitable: international B2C teams, hyper-flexible marketing models, crypto vector (with proper AML/KYT).
7) Kahnawake - Kahnawake (Canada)
Why TOP-7: A longtime market player with a stable legal framework and recognition in the iGaming community.
Pros: technical approach, reasonable cost of ownership, understandable hosting/certification procedures.
Cons: limited "exportability" to a number of jurisdictions; payment partners sometimes request enhanced justifications.
Who is suitable: B2C operators and B2B providers focused on international traffic without strictly local binding.
Summary comparison (short and by case)
Reputation of banks/payments: UKGC/MGA/Gibraltar/Isle of Man -; Alderney —; Kahnawake —; Curaçao (new model) -.
RG/audit severity: UKGC/Gibraltar - maximum; MGA/Isle of Man/Alderney - high; Curaçao/Kahnawake - medium high (growing).
Start dates (conditional): UKGC/Gibraltar - long; MGA/Isle of Man/Alderney - medium; Curaçao/Kahnawake - faster.
Cost of ownership: UKGC/Gibraltar - high; MGA/Isle of Man/Alderney - above average; Curaçao/Kahnawake is moderate.
Crypto flexibility: Curaçao/Kahnawake/Isle of Man - higher; MGA/Alderney - moderate; UKGC/Gibraltar - conservative.
How to choose a license for your strategy
Fast entry into the global market with reasonable compliance: Curaçao (new model )/Kahnawake - start, followed by relicense for premium markets.
Focus on premium payment channels and Tier-1 providers: MGA/Isle of Man/Alderney.
Maximum trust and "hard" RG (and work on Britain): UKGC/Gibraltar.
Crypto and flexibility of payment architecture: Curaçao/Kahnawake/Isle of Man (with thoughtful AML/KYT and off-ramp).
What is important for players (to distinguish a "strong" license)
Availability of self-exclusion tools, limits and timeouts.
RTP publishing and transparent game certification.
Understandable bonus conditions (vager, timing, game contribution).
Visible complaint/ADR channel and timeframe.
Segregation of funds and timing of payments, 2FA and data protection.
What is important for the operator (to pass painlessly)
Net structure of beneficiaries and origin of funds.
Competent MLRO/Compliance Officer, ready-made AML/KYC/RG/IS policies.
Certified content, logging rounds/payments, GGR reporting.
Readiness for external audits and penetration tests, incident response plan.
Marketing and affiliate control: anti-mislead, age targeting 18 +.
Licensing Roadmap (Simplified)
1. Preparation (4-12 weeks): KYC beneficiaries, business plan, AML/KYC/RG/IS policies, choice of payment and content providers.
2. Application (6-16 weeks): fees, key interviews, technical descriptions of the platform, contracts with providers.
3. Technical control and certification (in parallel): RNG/RTP, integration acts, hosting, logging, reporting.
4. Launch and post-license (permanent): reports, RG-KPIs, audits, advertising and affiliate control, recertification of game updates.
Common mistakes and how to avoid them
Underestimation of RG: no operating limits, formal policies without implementation → fines/suspension.
Hasty crypto integration: without KUT/address tracing and off-ramp rules → a block of payment partners.
"First marketing, then compliance": aggressive advertising before setting up 18 + and T&C filters → sanctions.
Weak control of game versions: changes in mathematics without recertification → serious risks for the license.
FAQ (short)
Is it possible to work under one international license "everywhere"?
No, it isn't. Many countries require a local license/permit. An international license is the basis for working "by default" where there is no local regulation or it allows international permissions.
What is the "cheapest" licence?
A low entry threshold does not always mean a low aggregate cost. Consider banks, integrations, audits, localization and marketing - it is often more profitable to choose a "heavy" license if it reduces operational risks.
What first: license or content/payments?
Cook in parallel. The regulator needs contracts with providers and payment partners, and providers need confirmation of the licensing process.
For mature, long-cycle oriented brands - MGA, UKGC, Gibraltar, Isle of Man, Alderney. For a flexible and fast international start - Curaçao (new model) or Kahnawake with a plan for relicense as it grows. The key to sustainability is not "where is cheaper," but how fully built RGs, game integrity, payments and affiliate control are.