What fines casinos face for license violation
In short: for what and how they punish
Regulators fine casinos (online and offline) for three groups of misdemeanors:1. Protection of the player and honesty of games - the rules of Responsible Gaming have been violated, mathematics/versions of games are not certified, RTP/RNG do not comply, payment delays.
2. Finance and AML/KYC/KYT - weak identification, opaque payments, lack of segregation of client funds, reports filed with distortions.
3. Marketing, data and operational contour - misleading advertising, targeting minors, data leaks, cybersecurity holes, lack of logs.
Sanctions usually go "ladder": prescription → fine → restriction of activities → suspension → revocation of license. In parallel, personal fines and disqualifications of managers are possible, as well as a criminal line for severe AML/fraud.
Types of sanctions (what can fly)
Financial
Fixed/range penalties (for each episode or day of delay).
Percentage of turnover/GGR (for large violations - sensitive and growing rapidly).
Confiscation of economic benefits (disgorgement) and compensation to players.
Daily penalties for failure to comply with regulations.
Non-financial
Restriction of verticals (prohibition of live/slots/bonuses before correction).
Freeze new registrations or marketing.
Suspension of the license for the duration of the investigation/remediation.
License revocation and no resubmission for N years.
Blacklists for key persons (disqualification of directors/MLRO/Compliance Officer).
Mandatory audits/monitoring at the expense of the operator, publication of the "public statement."
Risk matrix: violation → consequences
According to the fine: the logic of the regulator
1. Severity and duration of impairment (episode/periodic practice).
2. Scale of impact: number of players affected, amounts, ad reach.
3. Repetition and intent: whether there was a prescribed period for correction, whether traces were hidden.
4. Economic benefit: the profit gained must be taken into account.
5. Operator behavior: self-disclosure, cooperation, speed of remediation and compensation.
Cases (generalized, not tied to one jurisdiction)
Ignoring self-exclusion: the operator accepted deposits from self-excluded; bottom line - six-digit penalty, independent RG audit, mandatory public statement.
Undeclared slot edits: hot edit of RTP → symbol weights left the corridor; the result is a stop list of the game, a fine, force recertification, compensation to players.
AML failure on VIP: withdrawal of a large amount without EDD/source of funds → multimillion-dollar fine, personal sanctions, increased monitoring for a year.
"No risk" advertising: a campaign with the promise of a guaranteed win → a fine and a temporary ban on outdoor advertising/influencers.
Payment delay: cash gap → regulator introduces restrictions on new registrations, fine, reserve fund requirement.
What happens after a violation is detected: procedure
1. Notice of suspicion/letter of non-conformity: request for documents, logs, explanations.
2. Interview and sampling: the regulator checks samples of support rounds/payments/tickets.
3. Prescription: remediation time, time limits (for example, stopping bonuses).
4. Final decision: amount of fine/impact measure, audit and public disclosure requirements.
5. Appeal: Filing on time with evidence of good faith/disproportionate penalty.
6. Monitoring: post-factual reports, independent audit, control points.
How to prepare a position for appeal (practice)
Facts and logs: full package of unchangeable logs (WORM), comparison with reports.
Matrix of causes and consequences: who suffered, what amounts are compensated, what measures have already been implemented.
Voluntary steps: compensation for players, terminated contracts with violating affiliates, new policies.
Comparison with "similar cases": the argument about the proportionality of sanctions.
Remediation plan: deadlines, responsible persons, independent audit, KPIs (for example, the share of those verified before the deposit is 100%).
Prevention: 12 practices that dramatically reduce the risk of fines
1. RG "sewn into UX": limits/timeouts/self-exclusion in a prominent place, not hidden.
2. KYC to Game/Output + EDD for VIP/High Risk; regular POP/sanction screenings.
3. WORM logs of rounds/payments/admin actions + deviation dashboards.
4. Banning hot math edits: release gates, build hashes, recertification.
5. RTP monitoring: corridors, weekly reconciliations, automatic alerts and investigations.
6. Segregation of funds + reserve fund of payments; daily bank reconciliations.
7. Marketing review: checklist 18 +/anti-mislead, pre-approval of creatives, control of affiliates.
8. KYT and anti-fraud: rules on deposits/conclusions, investigations of "cash/mules" patterns.
9. Pentests/information security: MFA/SSO, key/seat management, IR/BCP exercises, DPIA.
10. Reporting by design: API/CSV layouts agreed, XBRL/portals tested, deadlines in the calendar.
11. Personnel training: annual certification of RG/AML/IS for support, marketing, engineers.
12. Legal market screening: local differences in advertising/taxes/online monitoring are taken into account even before launch.
Check sheets
Before Release/Campaign
- RNG/game certificates valid; 'game _ version _ hash' fixed
- RTP in the showcase matches the certificate; wager calculator running
- Creatives passed legal & compliance review; 18 + and disclaimers visible
- Whitelisted affiliates, UTM tags, and contracts are up to date
Daily/Weekly
- DQ-board of logs "green" (completeness/uniqueness/timeliness)
- RTP/payouts/jackpots in corridors; investigations into open alerts are underway
- Bank reconciliations: customer funds = platform balances
- AML/KYT reports (SAR/STR/CTR) generated and submitted on time
In case of incident
- IR playbook started (classification, RACI, timeline)
- Players notified and compensated if necessary
- Regulator notified at the required time with facts and logs
- Post-mortem + corrective action plan published
Frequent mistakes and their price
"Paper RG/AML": tools in words → heavy fines, increased monitoring, marketing ban.
No segregation of funds: delays in payments → freezing of activities/revocation.
Hot math edits: RTP departure → stop list of games, penalty, recertification.
Risk-free advertising: misleading tone → fines and public statements.
Weak information security: PII leak → privacy fines, mandatory audits, reputational losses.
Overdue reporting: penalties, repeated inspections, deterioration of relations with banks/providers.
A fine is not a "surprise," but a natural result of a weak process design. Operators who stitch compliance into the product - RG/AML/KYT, certified version-controlled content, immutable logs, segregation of funds, honest marketing and audit readiness - live crisis-free and grow faster. This saves money on sanctions, accelerates expansion into new markets and, most importantly, creates confidence among players and payment partners.