Crypto Casino
Torrent Gear
Why USDC and BUSD are becoming popular in casinos
Stablecoins have simplified payments in iGaming: you keep the face value in the "fiat," and money movements go along the blockchain - quickly, transparently and 24/7. Among the most common names for many years sounded USDC and BUSD. The first remains one of the main "workhorses" of the box office, the second has historically been popular in the Binance ecosystem (later many streams migrated to alternatives). Below is why it happened, where are the objective pros/cons and how to safely use stablecoins in a casino.
1) Why stablecoins are casino-friendly (overall)
Fixed price to the dollar. It is convenient for the player to count bankroll, for the operator to keep records and bonuses.
Speed and availability 24/7. Transfers in seconds/minutes, no "bank days."
Low fees. There are cents on L2 and fast L1 transactions, which is important for microdeposits and frequent inference.
Transparency. Any payment is confirmed by TxID; fewer disputed write-offs.
Multichain. It is easy to choose a network for the scenario: cheap L2 for frequency, L1 for a large sum.
2) Why exactly USDC
Reputation and reporting. Regular checks of reserves, work with large payment providers and banks.
Broad support. USDC accept exchanges, online/offline services and processing for iGaming; easy to build into checkout and billing.
Multi-chain without pain. There are native releases in popular networks (EVM-L2, Solana, etc.), which reduces dependence on bridges.
Reliable liquidity. Small conversion spread, deep markets in centralized and decentralized sites.
Convenience of accounting. Bonuses/rackbacks/jackpots at USDC are easy to reconcile with accounting and tax reporting.
Where the USDC goes especially well:- rapid replenishment/withdrawal via L2 (Arbitrum/Optimism/Base/Polygon);
- white-label cash registers with automatic receipt verification;
- cross-border payment to affiliates/partners.
3) What BUSD gave the market (and what's important to know now)
Historically, BUSD has been the "native" stablecoin of the Binance ecosystem:- Deep liquidity within Binance. Convenient conversion and zero/reduced commissions within the promo.
- Broad compatibility. Many Binance user-oriented casinos added BUSDs for seamless deposits (especially in conjunction with Binance Pay/P2P).
But it is important: the release of BUSD was curtailed, and the market gradually migrated to alternatives (USDC, USDT, FDUSD, etc.) depending on jurisdiction and integration. Therefore, today it is more correct to say: BUSD played the role of a popularizer of stablecoin payments in iGaming, and actual streams more often go through USDC/USDT/regional equivalents. If you still have BUSD at your checkout, check the support dates and migration plan.
4) Where are the savings and convenience for both parties
For the player
Predictable bankroll in "dollar" denomination.
Instant deposits/conclusions in your favorite network, minimal gas.
Transparency and control: all movements are visible in the wallet.
For the operator
Reduce acquiring and payment processing costs.
Easily automate bonuses/cashback in the same currency as the deposit.
Less disputes and "hung" transactions due to on-chain visibility.
5) Technical card for integrating stablecoins into the cashier
1. List of assets and networks. For example: USDC (Arbitrum/Optimism/Base/Solana), USDT (Tron/Ethereum), (if you still support BUSD, specify the network and EOL dates).
2. Webhooks/polling. Automatic calculation after the required number of confirmations; TTL addresses/invoices.
3. Pricing. Cash desk currency fix (usually USD) and implementation of price snapshot at the time of payment.
4. Returns. Separate on-chain operations with reference to the original order; log and notifications.
5. UX. Network prompts/memos/tags, timers, Copy Address/Invoice buttons, incorrect network warning.
6. Offramp. Connecting exchanges/P2P/providers for transparent outputs to partners and players.
6) Risks and how to minimize them
Wrong network/memo. Show large: "You send USDC (Arbitrum) "; required Memo/Tag fields for XRP/XLM/BEP2.
Bridges and cross chain. Use official/audited breeches; large amounts - only in tranches and after the test.
Approve/permit. Limit permissions for a specific amount and revoke them after the game (revoke).
Liquidity at conclusions. Keep reserves in the same networks where you accept deposits; set up automatic rebalancing.
Regional rules. Feature flags by country: where you can show a specific asset/network, and where not.
EOL assets. For BUSD (if you still have it): a clear disclaimer of support dates and an alternative migration scenario.
7) How to select a network for USDC (and/or BUSD replacement)
L2 (Arbitrum/Optimism/Base/Polygon): cheap, fast, ideal for frequent dep/ex.
Solana: high bandwidth and low commission; individual wallets/instruments.
Ethereum L1: more expensive, but suitable for large amounts and maximum compatibility.
Tron/BSC (for alternative stablecoins): Low price, but pay attention to bridges and custodial support.
8) Player checklist
- Checked which network and asset the cash register chooses (e.g. USDC on Arbitrum).
- Made a test transfer of $5- $20 before a large amount.
- Saved TxID and transaction card screen.
- When outputting, specified the same network; if I change the network, I use the official bridge.
- Revoked extra approve/permit after session.
9) Operator's checklist
- A list of assets/networks and minimum deposits has been published.
- Auto-accrual by webhook/confirmations, idempotency at the order level.
- Clear return policy and status display in UI.
- Provisions and rebalance against payments in the same networks.
- EOL asset disclaimer (if BUSD is mentioned somewhere) and ready migration.
- Monitoring memo/tags, prompts and validation at the front.
10) Mini-FAQ
USDC or BUSD - what to choose now? In most cases - USDC: broad support, liquidity and multi-chain. BUSD has historically been convenient in the Binance ecosystem; today, alternatives have often taken its place (e.g. USDC/USDT/regional stablecoins).
Lower fees than cards? Usually yes, especially in L2/fast L1s.
Is it possible to "transfer the network to the wrong place"? You can - and you will lose money. Always check the network and make a test payment.
Do KYC procedures need? For onramp/offramp and part of the casino - yes. Onchain translation itself does not replace KYC.
Is it worth keeping a bankroll in a stablecoin for a long time? For the convenience of accounting, yes, but store the main amounts in the cold and distribute them to networks/providers.
The popularity of USDC (and the former role of BUSD) in iGaming is understandable: a fixed "dollar" denomination, speed, low commissions and wide compatibility with cash registers and providers. In 2025, a rational strategy is to rely on USDC and supported alternatives, clearly indicate networks, automate offsets/returns and maintain security discipline (test payments, limited approve, proven bridges). Then stablecoins give casinos and players maximum convenience without unnecessary risks.