How to check your casino license before signing up
Why do it
A license is not a logo in a footer, but a legal right to accept bets, keep funds and process your data. The check takes 5-10 minutes and saves from freezing the balance, denial of payments and toxic conditions.
Quick check algorithm (5 steps)
Step 1. Find the props in the footer
Look for:- license number, full legal entity (Ltd/LLC/SA, etc.), jurisdiction (e.g., "licensed by Commission X"), address, references to "Terms & Conditions," "Responsible Gambling," "Privacy/AML."
Step 2. Check on the regulator's website
Go to the official register of the regulator (through the search engine for the query "regulator + register"). Check:- whether your legal entity is on the list, license status (valid/suspended/canceled), trading names and domains - the current site, allowed verticals (casino/sports/live) and age/geo-restrictions must match.
Step 3. Match domain and brand
The same company ≠ the same name. See if the domain is listed in the license card and if the brand matches in "trading as." Mismatch is the reason to ask the support a question.
Step 4. Check badges and audits
Badges eCOGRA/iTech Labs/GLI/ISO should lead to the verification page, where your domain/brand is indicated. Unclickable, blurry pictures are a sign of imitation.
Step 5. Read the critical points of the rules
withdrawal limits and deadlines, KYC/EDD/SoF rules, bonus terms (vager, max bet/win), complaints/ADR section (independent ombudsman), closed loop policy (withdrawal to deposit source).
If there is no ADR and deadlines for resolving disputes, this is a minus.
What does "reliable license" mean (without politicization and myths)
The regulator has a public register, transparent sanctions and complaints mechanics.
The license is issued for a legal entity, and not "for the brand as a whole."
Allowed countries and prohibited geo are indicated; the site blocks registration from prohibited jurisdictions.
KYC/AML and responsible play (limits, self-exclusion) are required.
There is an ADR/Ombudsman - an independent mechanism for resolving player complaints.
Red flags (from practice)
1. No license number - only logo/text "licensed somewhere."
2. The link in the footer leads not to the regulator, but to the blog/copy of the domain.
3. The legal entity does not coincide: in the registry one thing, in the rules - another.
4. The domain is not in the license card; trade name does not match.
5. Unclickable audit/responsible play badges.
6. Aggressive bonuses with dishonest conditions (huge vager, "max bonus win" 50-100 €).
7. Barrage rules for conclusions: "only X per month," "only through provider Y," incomprehensible commissions.
8. No ADR and timeframe for complaint response; a ban on bringing disputes out.
9. Intrusive "intermediaries" for verification (they ask you to send documents to the messenger, and not through the office).
10. Hidden affiliation - a clone site with the same texts and support.
Additional two-click checks
Whois/domain age: a freshly registered domain under the "old brand" is a reason to be wary.
Payment rails: well-known PSP/wallets/cards and local fast transfers - plus to trust; "gray" aggregators - minus.
RG policy: presence of deposit/loss/self-exclusion limits and understandable forms.
Transparency of RTP/game providers: list of providers and verifiable RNG certificates.
How to ask a support (template)
1. Full legal entity of the operator and license number.
2. Link to the register of the regulator with the card of our domain/brand.
3. Who is your ADR/Ombudsman and how to file a complaint?
4. Timing and limits of conclusions, is there a closed-loop policy?
Thank you!
Refusing to provide this data is a reason to leave.
Common Questions (Mini-FAQ)
Is the regulator logo in a footer enough?
No, it isn't. There must be a license number and a clickable link to the card in the registry.
If there is a company in the registry, but not my domain?
Check with your support. While the domain is not officially tied - risk.
Casino writes "license from platform provider" - is that ok?
Partner "white labels" are found, but the domain must be covered by this license (trading name/authorized URL).
Can I trust feedback on forums instead of the registry?
Feedback is helpful, but only the regulator's register and ADRs confirm legal status.
What else to check in the rules?
KYC/SoF, withdrawal limits, bonus clauses, processing times, complaint procedure and DPO (privacy) contacts.
Check-list before registration (print)
- The footer has a license number and a legal entity.
- The link leads to the official register, the status of the license is valid.
- The domain and brand are indicated in the card (trading names/authorized URLs).
- There is an ADR/Ombudsman and an understandable complaints procedure.
- Limits/lead times, closed-loop policy and KYC are prescribed.
- Audit badges (eCOGRA/GLI/iTech Labs) are clickable about this domain.
- Real RG tools (limits, self-exclusion).
- Payment methods are known and local, without "gray" schemes.
- Bonus rules are transparent: vager, max bet, games contribution.
- Privacy policy and DPO contacts are available.
License verification is not a formality, but basic hygiene before registration. Check the legal entity, number and status in the registry, make sure that your domain/brand is actually covered by the license, check the ADR, conclusions, KYC/RG and the clickability of the badges. Ten minutes of verification - and you either calmly register, or save yourself money and nerves.
