How AI increases security in transactions

Article volumetric text

Online payments are growing, and with them - the complexity of attacks: from account hijackings and bonus abuse to schemes with drop wallets and money laundering. The classic "if-then" rules no longer have time. Artificial intelligence (AI/ML) adds dynamic risk analysis: assesses a transaction, user context and device behavior in milliseconds, blocking anomalies and minimizing friction for bona fide customers.

What exactly is AI doing to secure transactions

1. Behavioral Analytics (UBA/UEBA)

Models compare current actions with a personal norm: gesture speed, click patterns, screen transitions, time on the form of payment. Sharp deviations - trigger for step-up verification.

2. Anomaly and real-time risk scoring

Gradient boosting, random forest, isolation forests and online learning calculate the likelihood of fraud based on hundreds of traits: account age, transaction density, amount deviations, night activity, geolocation gap, frequency of unsuccessful 3DS.

3. Device and network fingerprint

Fingerprinting (browser, graphic context, fonts, IP-AS, proxy/VPN, mobile SDK) forms a stable identifier. Matches "many accounts - one device" or "one account - a swarm of devices" lead to flags.

4. Graph analysis of relationships

AI builds the graph "user - card - device - address - wallet." Clusters associated with chargebacks, bonus farm or cashing out are allocated and automatically receive increased risk.

5. Rule + ML hybrid

ML gives probability, rules - explainability and compliance with policy. The combination reduces false positives and provides compliance control.

6. Risk-based authentication

At low risk - seamless passage. With an average of 3DS2/OTP. At high - block and manual check. This increases conversion without compromising security.

7. Crypto specificity

Targeted risk scoring, analysis of online patterns (mixer services, freshly created wallets, "peel-chain"), comparison of exchanges/wallets with reputation lists.

Typical threat scenarios and how AI catches them

Account Takeover (account hijacking): unusual geography + device change + UEBA values → step-up and output freeze.

Bonus-abuse/multiaccounting: graph of connections + common payment details + the same behavioral patterns → refusal to participate and return the deposit according to the policy.

The schemes also cash out drop accounts: bursts of transactions per limit, quick transfers to external wallets, "vertical" cascades of amounts → high-risk flags and SAR/AML reports.

Carding/chargebacks: BIN risk, billing mismatch and geo, failed 3DS attempts in a row → block before verification.

Bots and scripts: atypical input speed, uniform intervals, no human micro-variations → detection and captcha/stop.

Solution architecture: what makes up the "AI front" of security

Data flow: login event, KYC/AML statuses, payment attempts, SDK/web logs, online providers.

Streaming and orchestration: Kafka/PubSub + real-time processing (Flink/Spark Streaming).

Fichestore: centralized feature storage (online/offline synchronization, drift control, versioning).

Models:

gradient boosting (XGBoost/LightGBM) - strong baseline;
autoencoders/Isolation Forest - search for anomalies without tags;
graph neural networks (GNN) - connections between entities;
sequence models - behavior over time.
Rules and policies: declarative engine (YAML/DSL) with priorities and time-to-live.
Human-in-the-loop: case queues, markup, feedback for regular retraining.
Explainability: SHAP/LIME for causal clues in controversial cases.
Reliability and latency: p95 <150-250 ms for evaluation, fault tolerance, caching of negative lists.
Logs and audits: immutable activity logs for regulators and internal proceedings.

Success metrics (and how not to fool yourself)

Fraud Capture Rate (TPR): Proportion of fraud caught.

False Positive Rate (FPR): Extra friction for honest customers.

Approval Rate/Auth-Success: conversion of successful payments.

Chargeback Rate/Dispute-Loss: Final loss.

Blocked Fraud Value: prevented damage in foreign currency.

Friction Rate - The proportion of users who have passed step-up.

ROC-AUC, PR-AUC: shear stability of the model.

Time-to-Decision: scoring delay.

Important: evaluate in A/B tests and cohorts (beginners, high rollers, crypto users) so as not to worsen LTV for the sake of "beautiful" anti-fraud numbers.

Regulatory and compliance

PCI DSS: storage and processing of cards with segmentation and tokenization.

GDPR/local data laws: minimization, processing goals, right to explain automated decisions.

KYC/AML: sources of funds, sanctions screening/PEP, reporting, limits.

SCA/3DS2 (EEA, etc.): risk-based exceptions and soft flow where acceptable.

ISO 27001/27701: security and privacy processes.

Practical implementation checklist

1. Threat mapping: Which types of scams are hitting your business.

2. Data collection and events: unify web/mobile/payment logging.

3. Quick baseline: rules + finished ML model based on historical data.

4. Fichestor and monitoring: data quality, drift, SLA delays.

5. Step-up matrix: clear risk thresholds and authentication options.

6. Explainability and incident parsing: flag reasons are available to the support team.

7. Personnel training and escalation processes: who decides what and in what time frame.

8. A/B tests and feedback: regular releases of models, "black lists" and "white corridors."

9. Compliance review: verification of legal grounds and user notifications.

10. Crisis plan: manual overrides, degradation modes, "kill switch."

Cases by industry

iGaming and fintech: 30-60% reduction in bonus abuse by graph models when FPR falls thanks to hybrid scoring.

Crypto payments: targeted risk scoring + behavioral features → fewer fraud conclusions and faster verification of honest players.

Marketplaces/subscriptions: antibot layer and behavioral analysis → fewer stolen card tests without a sharp increase in captchas.

Common mistakes

Overfit on past schemes. Attacks evolve; need online features and regular retraining.

Excessive friction. Blind screwing of thresholds destroys conversion and LTV.

There is no explainability. Support and compliance cannot protect solutions - there is a growing conflict with users and regulators.

Dirty data. Without quality control, the signs begin to lie, and the model degrades.

Mini-FAQ

Will AI replace the rules?

No, it isn't. The best results are provided by a combination: ML - for flexibility and adaptation, rules - for clear prohibitions and regulatory explainability.

How to quickly see the effect?

Often - already on the first baseline with historical features and a neat step-up matrix. Further - increments through A/B tests.

Do I need to store raw card data?

If possible, no: tokenization at PSP, editing feature sets without PCI DSS violation.

AI translates transaction security from static rules to an adaptive system, where each payment is evaluated taking into account context, behavior and connections. Properly configured architecture means less losses from scammers, higher approval, less friction and resistance to new schemes. The key is in data, decision transparency and implementation discipline.